Lecture 8

 

1. Wavepacket

In free-space (1D), the wavepacket (波包) at t=0

(1)w(x,0)=exp[ikc(xxc)]exp[12σ2(xxc)2]=σ2πdkexp[ik(xxc)]exp[σ22(kkc)2]

packet

The packet evolves as

(2)w(x,t)=σ2πdkexp[i(k(xxc)ω(k)t]exp[σ22(kkc)2]

where ω(k) is the dispersion relation. If we expand around the center of wavepacket

(3)ω=ωc+ωc(kkc)+12ωc(kkc)2+

we find

(4)w(k,t)=eiϕ(t)exp[ikc(xx((t))]exp[12σ(t)2(xxc(t))2]

where

(5)ϕ(t)=kc(vpvg)t,σ(t)=σ2+(ωctσ)2

vp=ωc/kc is the phase velocity, and vg=ωc=(dω/dk)kc is the group velocity.

image-20230315191014102

(6)x˙c(t)=ddtw(t)|x|w(t)=w(0)|i[H,x(t))|w(0)=w(0)|p(t)m|w(0)=w(t)|pm|w(t)
(7)ddtp=pt+i[H,p]=Hx

So

(8)xc(t)=Hpk˙c(t)=Hx

This is the so-called Ehrenfest theorem.

That is to say, if we talk about a wavepacket in terms of its center of mass and center of momentum, we may recover the classical dynamics. This is the key idea of semiclassical dynamics.

We want to apply this trick to Bloch electrons, so we need wavepacket that is localized in both real and k-space

(9)|W0=1Nkw(k)|ψk

Normalization ucd3r|uk(r)|2=1

(10)W0|W0=1k|w(k)|2=1

image-20230315165920910

What is rc? need position operator in the Bloch representation (布洛赫表象)

(11)r|W0=1Nkw(k)r|ψk=1Nkw(k)(ikeikr)|uk=1Nkw(k)eikrik|uk+(ikw(k))|ψk

In the last step, we have performed an integration by parts (分部积分). We now introduce a quantity call the Berry connection

(12)A(k)=uk|ik|uk

So the center of the wavepacket is

(13)rc=kw(k)(ik+A(k))w(k)

that is simply stating that in the Bloch representation

(14)rik+A(k)

The Bloch wavefunctions have U(1) gauge freedom. That is,

(15)ψkeiχ(k)ψk

is still the same Bloch state. Under this change of basis, we find

(16)A(k)A(k)kχ

which ensures that the center of a wavepacket is invariant.

 

2. Semiclassical equations of motion

In an external electromagnetic potential a(r,t) for uniform magnetic and electric fields

(17)B=×a,E=ta.

After a careful calculation1

(18)L(rc,kc,r˙c,k˙c)=w|iddtH|w=ea(rc,t)rc+kcr˙c+Ak˙cE

where

(19)E=ε(kc)+BM(kc)M=e2mw|(rrc)×p|w0

M is the orbital moment from the self-rotation of a wavepacket.

 

Hereafter, we will drop subscript c. Consider

(20)L=ε(k)ea(r,t)r˙+kr˙

For a uniform magnetic field,

(21)a(r)=12B×r

So this leads to the EOM

(22)r˙=εk,k˙=eEer˙×B

The novel term in the Lagrangian is Ak˙, with which we have

(23)r˙=εkk˙×Ω(k),k˙=eEer˙×B

where the pseudovector Ω is defined via

(24)Ωαβ=AβkαAαkβ=ϵαβγΩγ.

Ω is called the Berry curvature of Bloch electrons, whose contribution to the velocity r˙(k) is called the anomalous velocity (反常速度).

 

3. Anomalous Hall effect

Under an electric field, the anomalous velocity can cause a transverse current, even without an external magnetic field. This is called the anomalous Hall effect (反常霍尔效应).

anomalous hall

Historically, there had been an debate over the origin of the anomalous Hall effect (AHE). If the anomalous Hall current comes from the Berry curvature of the Bloch bands, as described above, it is called the intrinsic AHE since it depends on the band structure and not on scattering. Correspondingly, the AHE conducitivtiy is

(25)σαβ=e2nBZ[dk]f0(εnk)Ωnkαβ=ϵαβγe2nBZ[dk]f0(εnk)Ωnkγ.

Take a two-dimensional system as an example,

(26)ρxyσxyσxx2ρ2

image-20230316092812665

Early experimental data2 suggest β1.9. However, there had been a long debate, as at finite temperatures inelastic scattering by bosons (phonon or magnon) makes a complete microscopic theory difficult. Other origins of the AHE have been suggested. These theories are based certain asymmetry in impurity scattering, such as side jump and skew scattering, which are called extrinic mechanisms. We will not go into details of these extrinsic mechanism, interested readers can consult Nagaosa's review.3

How do we measure the AHE conductivity? People have noted that the Hall effect in ferromagnetic and nonmagnetic metals are very different. In nonmagnetic metals, the Hall current comes the Lorentz force. In a ferromagnet, ρxy is linear in applied magnetic field when Hz is small, but then saturates (饱和) at high fields. Empirically, peopel have found

(27)ρxy=R0Hz+RsMz

image-20230316095302289

 

 

References and notes

 


1 Ming-Che Chang and Qian Niu. Phys. Rev. B 53, 7010 (1996).
2 Kooi, C., 1954, Phys. Rev. 95, 843
3 Nagaosa et al.: Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010).